0.11/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.11/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 180
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 07:21:38 EDT 2024
0.12/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.19/0.48	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.19/0.48	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AescM24MdM/E---3.1_12431.p
0.19/0.49	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.19/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 900s (5) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting new_ho_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# post_as_ho12 with pid 12510 completed with status 0
0.19/0.49	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.19/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 900s (5) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# No SInE strategy applied
0.19/0.49	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSM00-SSSFFSBN
0.19/0.49	# partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFSBN
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting sh3 with 98s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# sh3 with pid 12518 completed with status 0
0.19/0.49	# Result found by sh3
0.19/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 900s (5) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# No SInE strategy applied
0.19/0.49	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSM00-SSSFFSBN
0.19/0.49	# partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFSBN
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting sh3 with 98s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.19/0.49	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.19/0.49	
0.19/0.49	# Proof found!
0.19/0.49	# SZS status Theorem
0.19/0.49	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_22, type, lAnna_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_24, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_27, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_28, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_29, type, parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_30, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_31, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_32, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_33, type, esk4_0: $i).
0.19/0.49	thf(con, conjecture, ?[X3:$i > $i > $o, X4:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i]:(((((X4 @ X2 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)&~(((X4)=(^[X5:$i, X6:$i]:(($true))))))&~(((X3)=(^[X5:$i, X6:$i]:(($true))))))&(X3 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AescM24MdM/E---3.1_12431.p', con)).
0.19/0.49	thf(ax_003, axiom, ?[X1:$i, X2:$i]:(~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AescM24MdM/E---3.1_12431.p', ax_003)).
0.19/0.49	thf(ax, axiom, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AescM24MdM/E---3.1_12431.p', ax)).
0.19/0.49	thf(ax_002, axiom, ?[X1:$i, X2:$i]:(~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AescM24MdM/E---3.1_12431.p', ax_002)).
0.19/0.49	thf(ax_007, axiom, (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AescM24MdM/E---3.1_12431.p', ax_007)).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X3:$i > $i > $o, X4:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i]:(((((X4 @ X2 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)&~(![X14:$i, X15:$i]:(((X4 @ X14 @ X15)<=>$true))))&~(![X16:$i, X17:$i]:(((X3 @ X16 @ X17)<=>$true))))&(X3 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X20:$i > $i > $o, X21:$i > $i > $o, X22:$i, X23:$i, X24:$i, X25:$i, X26:$i]:((((~(X20 @ X25 @ X26)|($true)|(~(X21 @ X23 @ X24)|($true)|~(X21 @ X22 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~(X20 @ X22 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))&(~($true)|(X20 @ X25 @ X26)|(~(X21 @ X23 @ X24)|($true)|~(X21 @ X22 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~(X20 @ X22 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))&((~(X20 @ X25 @ X26)|($true)|(~($true)|(X21 @ X23 @ X24)|~(X21 @ X22 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~(X20 @ X22 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))&(~($true)|(X20 @ X25 @ X26)|(~($true)|(X21 @ X23 @ X24)|~(X21 @ X22 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~(X20 @ X22 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X5:$i, X4:$i > $i > $o, X3:$i > $i > $o, X6:$i, X7:$i]:(((X3 @ X1 @ X2)|(X4 @ X5 @ X6)|~(($true))|~(($true))|~((X4 @ X7 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((X3 @ X7 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_8, plain, ?[X1:$i, X2:$i]:(~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax_003])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X5:$i, X4:$i > $i > $o, X3:$i > $i > $o, X6:$i, X7:$i]:(((X4 @ X5 @ X6)|(X3 @ X1 @ X2)|~((X4 @ X7 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((X3 @ X7 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_10, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_11, plain, ?[X1:$i, X2:$i]:(~(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax_002])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_12, plain, ~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X6:$i, X5:$i, X3:$i > $i > $o]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)|(X3 @ X5 @ X6)|~((X3 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_14, plain, (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax_007])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_15, plain, ~(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_16, plain, ~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X5:$i, X6:$i]:(((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X5 @ X6))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_18, plain, ~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_20, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])]), ['proof']).
0.19/0.49	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.19/0.49	# Parsed axioms                        : 19
0.19/0.49	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.19/0.49	# Initial clauses                      : 22
0.19/0.49	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 12
0.19/0.49	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
0.19/0.49	# Processed clauses                    : 24
0.19/0.49	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.19/0.49	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.19/0.49	# ...remaining for further processing  : 24
0.19/0.49	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.19/0.49	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.19/0.49	# Backward-subsumed                    : 1
0.19/0.49	# Backward-rewritten                   : 5
0.19/0.49	# Generated clauses                    : 16
0.19/0.49	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13
0.19/0.49	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.19/0.49	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.19/0.49	# Paramodulations                      : 16
0.19/0.49	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.19/0.49	# NegExts                              : 0
0.19/0.49	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.19/0.49	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.19/0.49	# Total rewrite steps                  : 5
0.19/0.49	# ...of those cached                   : 0
0.19/0.49	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.19/0.49	# Current number of processed clauses  : 8
0.19/0.49	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
0.19/0.49	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.19/0.49	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.19/0.49	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
0.19/0.49	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9
0.19/0.49	# ...number of literals in the above   : 26
0.19/0.49	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.19/0.49	# Current number of archived clauses   : 16
0.19/0.49	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
0.19/0.49	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
0.19/0.49	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.19/0.49	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.19/0.49	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.19/0.49	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
0.19/0.49	# BW rewrite match successes           : 6
0.19/0.49	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.19/0.49	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.19/0.49	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1090
0.19/0.49	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 190
0.19/0.49	
0.19/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.49	# User time                : 0.005 s
0.19/0.49	# System time              : 0.000 s
0.19/0.49	# Total time               : 0.005 s
0.19/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
0.19/0.49	
0.19/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.49	# User time                : 0.006 s
0.19/0.49	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.19/0.49	# Total time               : 0.007 s
0.19/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
0.19/0.50	% E---3.1 exiting
0.19/0.50	% E exiting
0.19/0.50	EOF